Choosing the right pistol for concealed carry is a deeply personal decision, influenced by factors like size, weight, capacity, and personal preference. Two popular contenders often find themselves head-to-head in this arena: the Kel-Tec Sub 2000 and the Smith & Wesson M&P FPC (Folding Pistol Carbine). Both offer unique advantages, but which one reigns supreme? This detailed comparison will help you decide.
Key Differences: A Quick Overview
Before diving into the specifics, let's highlight the core differences between these two firearms. The Kel-Tec Sub 2000 is a pistol-caliber carbine that folds for compact storage and transport. It's known for its affordability and lightweight design. The Smith & Wesson M&P FPC, while also a folding pistol, prioritizes a more robust feel and integrates with multiple Glock and Smith & Wesson pistol frames. This offers more versatility in caliber and customization options.
Kel-Tec Sub 2000: Lightweight and Affordable
The Kel-Tec Sub 2000's primary selling points are its affordability and incredibly lightweight design. This makes it an attractive option for those seeking a secondary firearm for home defense or a lightweight option for extended carry.
Advantages:
- Lightweight and Compact: When folded, it's remarkably compact and easy to store.
- Affordable: Generally less expensive than the S&W M&P FPC.
- Multiple Caliber Options: Available in 9mm, .40 S&W, and .45 ACP, offering flexibility to match your preferred ammunition.
- Simple Design: Known for its straightforward and reliable mechanism.
Disadvantages:
- Polymer Construction: While lightweight, some users find the polymer construction less substantial than metal frames.
- Basic Sights: The standard sights are functional, but not as refined as those on some competitor models.
- Recoil: Can feel snappier than some heavier alternatives.
Smith & Wesson M&P FPC: Versatile and Customizable
The Smith & Wesson M&P FPC takes a different approach, focusing on versatility and customization. Its ability to adapt to different Glock and Smith & Wesson pistol frames offers a significant advantage for users who already own compatible handguns.
Advantages:
- Versatility: Adaptable to various pistol frames, allowing for caliber flexibility and shared magazines.
- Robust Construction: Generally perceived as having a more solid build and feel compared to the Kel-Tec.
- Improved Ergonomics: Often praised for superior ergonomics and a more comfortable shooting experience.
- Accessory Rails: Offers accessory rails for lights, lasers, and other tactical accessories.
Disadvantages:
- Higher Price Point: Significantly more expensive than the Kel-Tec Sub 2000.
- Weight: Heavier than the Kel-Tec, which can impact concealability.
- Limited Caliber Options (depending on pistol frame): While versatile, the available calibers are still determined by the compatible pistol frame.
Head-to-Head Comparison Table:
| Feature | Kel-Tec Sub 2000 | Smith & Wesson M&P FPC |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Lower | Higher |
| Weight | Lighter | Heavier |
| Size (Folded) | More Compact | Less Compact |
| Material | Polymer | Metal & Polymer |
| Versatility | Limited to specific calibers | Highly versatile (depending on frame) |
| Customization | Fewer options | More options (rails, etc.) |
| Recoil | Higher | Lower |
Conclusion: Choosing the Right Weapon
The "best" choice between the Kel-Tec Sub 2000 and the Smith & Wesson M&P FPC ultimately depends on your individual needs and priorities. The Kel-Tec is ideal for budget-conscious buyers seeking a lightweight and compact option. The Smith & Wesson M&P FPC, while more expensive, provides superior versatility, customization, and a more robust feel. Consider your budget, intended use, and personal preferences before making a decision. Remember to always consult with a firearms professional and follow all applicable laws and regulations.
